<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can A Personal Life Coach Help You?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://personallifecoachonline.com/can-a-personal-life-coach-help-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://personallifecoachonline.com/can-a-personal-life-coach-help-you/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:40:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Life Coaches</title>
		<link>http://personallifecoachonline.com/can-a-personal-life-coach-help-you/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Life Coaches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personallifecoachonline.com/?p=64#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Great Post!

I agree with you 100% coaching can be a huge benefit for those who are stuck in their lives.  

The problem is that coaching has gotten a bad rap in the last couple of years. Part of the reason is that anyone can call themselves a coach without getting some much as a piece of paper from an online ‘university’. That makes it hard to monitor quality.  So the top coaches ($100s per hour) and quack hacks fall under the same umbrella.  That does terrible things for the coaching brand...

I just wrote a great piece with this sort of angle. The basic idea is that if coaching works for the CEO of Google (yes, Eric Schmidt has a coach!) then we can all find a place for it somewhere in our lives!

Thanks for the article.

Cheers

Jesse</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Post!</p>
<p>I agree with you 100% coaching can be a huge benefit for those who are stuck in their lives.  </p>
<p>The problem is that coaching has gotten a bad rap in the last couple of years. Part of the reason is that anyone can call themselves a coach without getting some much as a piece of paper from an online ‘university’. That makes it hard to monitor quality.  So the top coaches ($100s per hour) and quack hacks fall under the same umbrella.  That does terrible things for the coaching brand&#8230;</p>
<p>I just wrote a great piece with this sort of angle. The basic idea is that if coaching works for the CEO of Google (yes, Eric Schmidt has a coach!) then we can all find a place for it somewhere in our lives!</p>
<p>Thanks for the article.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Jesse</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
